為何居屋改為公屋？ 為避免日後無休止的訴訟？

下圖所見是香港新界西北某屋苑, 外觀不錯吧。 如果你細心看, 你可能驚覺這並非適合所有人居住, 因為他顯示什麼是絕對屏風。 看看另外的兩張圖的說明。

 

所有的單位都是短狹的大廳窗戶, 很多都被厚厚的房牆遮擋著光線和空氣, 房間悶熱長年陰暗。 外向的單位還可以，內向的單位便見仁見智。或者有人認為最適合長者：敗其筋骨，慟心忍性, 體現疾苦，與佛同行，早登極樂， 善哉。

 

 

註：

1. 「屏風效應」是指高樓密集如同屏風，阻礙了自然風的流動，導致城市空氣品質惡化、氣溫升高和光污染加劇。 這種現象會加劇「熱島效應」和「高樓峽谷風」，影響居民的健康，並可能導致呼吸道疾病比例增加。

2. 那屋苑不是一般的高密屏風, 是毒害屏風。設計者那會不知！

今夕何夕

What night is tonight 今夕何夕?

（the night after Mid-Autumn festival)

It's so quiet tonight at Central bewteen IFC and Shun Tak Centre; merely 8:30 p.m., and the street was empty.

Hong Kong is not really the vibrant city it used to be, and perhaps its people's happiness has faded too.

Our AI is on the wrong path

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rv9vhv8AGuc

An interesting video - Our AI is on the wrong path!

By human reasoning, Richard Sutton seems to be correct. Being a Turing Award winner, his mind would definitely be different from the ordinary. In my days of studies, most undergraduate students found it hard/abstract to understand Turing's theory/the theory of computation, as not everyone had the cognitive ability for it.

A couple of weeks ago, when chatted with AI tools on nuclear energy, I came to the conclusion that the human race will eventually become extinct. The human biological form has too many constraints. It would not survive without food, in extreme weather, or under high radiation. However, humanity - its history, culture, knowledge, and achievements - may continue to exist as a digital legacy.

For those who have seen "Star Trek: The Motion Picture (the 1979 film)" may remember the final scene, where a new life form emerges through the merging of a superintelligent machine and a human.

信中央

新聞標題：警司陸振中危駕及襲擊判社服240小時　陸就定罪上訴　律政司亦要求覆核刑期

看官會不會以為刑罰過輕令到有啲人short咗 要上訴。

我可以告诉你，非也！因為有先例。有撞到人要截肢嘅都係社會服務令240小時。

今回只係危險駕駛， 冇撞死/傷人， 陸官階高過督察， 點解要判240小時？咁搞法「受害人」隨時可以上訴「震」動「中」央！

况且資本髮不是一早說明， 公墓園待遇只會比以前好， 不會倒退。 蟻民一定要「冼種秧」。